Thousands of union coal miners and their families gathered this summer in Columbus, Ohio, wielding signs and wearing camouflage United Mine Workers of America shirts.
UMWA President Cecil Roberts led the crowd in a call-and-response chant.
“I want you to send a loud, clear signal that we are one! We are one!”
But the miners weren’t there for a strike or to picket a company over a contract dispute. They were demonstrating to draw attention to an often overlooked issue: Pensions.
In the months before midterm elections, thousands of miners, retirees, and other union members from around the Ohio Valley have joined rallies and made road trips to lobby lawmakers over the shaky financial condition of their pension funds.
It’s not just miners. Workers represented by the Teamsters, Ironworkers, and the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco workers and Grain Millers unions are all worried about the security of their pensions. Uncertainty about pensions also played a big part in the teacher strikes in West Virginia and Kentucky.
Labor leaders are looking to Congress to help shore up shaky pension funds and they pledge to make pensions an issue when voters head to the polls in a few weeks. The issue could play a role in the region’s two competitive races for the U.S. Senate, as Democrats Joe Manchin, of West Virginia, and Sherrod Brown, of Ohio, seek reelection in historically union states that went for President Trump in 2016.
Larry Miller of Ohio County, Kentucky, mined coal for 20 years before retiring. He was among a group of UMWA members who worked the halls on Capitol Hill last month to encourage support for a measure to shore up the miners’ pension fund. He said pension security is his top voting issue.
“I vote in my world on this pension and that’s just the way it is,” Miller said. “There’s no other factors for me. I gotta take care of my family.”
Miller said he and his wife based their retirement on social security and his pension. He said if they lose one leg of that they’ll be faced with tough financial decisions. Miller said he isn’t the only one either. Without those pensions many widows and retirees won’t be able to get by. Phil Smith is a spokesperson for the UMWA.
“We’ve made it very clear to our members, and our members are making it very clear to their elected officials, that this is an issue they’re voting on,” Smith said. “This is issue number one; this is life or death for them.”
Smith said if these miners don’t have their pensions that will pull money out of small coal community economies, putting more strain on social programs.
“Here’s something that you can count on. The cost of providing social services is going to go up,” he said.
Pensions for some 43,000 retired coal miners in the Ohio Valley alone could be at risk. Coal company bankruptcies and the 2008 recession have undermined retiree pensions. If a pension system becomes insolvent it falls to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to help pay out those benefits. But lawmakers have warned that the PBGC could also be on shaky ground if a large retiree group’s pension such as the UMWA’s fails.
Congress created the Joint Select Committee on Solvency of Multiemployer Pension Plans as a bipartisan committee tasked with shoring up at-risk multiemployer pension plans. In a reflection of the issue’s importance in the region, both Brown and Manchin are on the Joint Select Committee; Brown is its co-chair.
To date the committee has held six hearings. Brown has also proposed the Butch Lewis Act, named after an Ohio Teamster who has since passed away. The legislation would allow the Department of the Treasury to make loans to multiemployer plans.
Manchin wanted to pass the American Miners Pension Act last year which would transfer excess funds from the federal Abandoned Mine Land program to the UMW pension plan. Manchin said bankruptcy laws are also at the root of the problem.
“This will repeat itself time and time again. We’re not going to change it unless we change our bankruptcy laws,” Manchin said.
Brown and Manchin have picked up some bipartisan support for pension protection. But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has said that he prefers to address troubled pension plans as part of a broader pension reform effort.
In West Virginia, Manchin faces a tough challenge from Republican Attorney General, Patrick Morrisey, and has made pensions and health benefits for miners a frequent talking point on the campaign trail and in campaign ads.
In Ohio, the pensions issue surfaced earlier this month when Brown faced off with his challenger, Republican Rep. Jim Renacci, for their first debate in Cleveland.
Brown is known for wearing a lapel pin in the shape of a canary as a symbol of his concern for workers — a nod to the “canary in the coal mine” that would signal trouble for miners. But Renacci used the canary pin to pose a question about the Brown’s commitment to coal miners.
“My grandfather was a proud coal miner and if my grandfather was alive today y’know what he would say?” Renacci asked. “Senator Brown, you don’t support me, you don’t support me as a coal miner.”
Brown shot back.
“I do wear this canary in the birdcage to symbolize my support for mine workers, my support for all workers, my support for the dignity of work,” he said, and quickly pointed out his bipartisan work on pensions and health benefits for miners.
“Right now I’m co-chair along with Senator Hatch, very conservative Republican of Utah, to restore the pensions for 60,000 workers in Ohio.”
In an interview after the debate, Brown said he doesn’t want to make the pension issue a partisan matter and he just wants to see it resolved. Brown said the November 30th deadline for a solution to shore up pensions was set specifically for after the election to avoid making it a campaign issue.
“But ultimately this issue is whose side are you on? Do you stand on the side of mine workers? Do you stand on the side of teamster retirees, and fight for workers, or are you on the side of Wall Street? And this has been a pretty clear division in my mind,” he said.
Renacci has also taken action on the pension issue. In September he sent a letter to the Joint Select Committee requesting an additional hearing on bipartisan solutions for the pensions at risk.
The results from the closely-watched April special election in western Pennsylvania could be an indicator of how pensions are motivating voters in the region. Democrat Conor Lamb narrowly won a Republican-controlled House seat largely due to labor support and his pledge to support pension security. Like Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia still have a high percentage of union households where labor issues resonate.
“Somebody who’s going to fight for pensions fight for retirement security, those type of candidates are going to appeal greatly to these union voters,” said Pennsylvania Democratic consultant Mike Mikus.
Mikus said the kind of candidates that are fighting for retirement security are going to appeal to the Democratic voters who voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.
“There have been a lot of what are union Democrats gravitate to the Republican party,” he said. “And I think if a Democratic candidate puts that issue front and center I think they can over-perform what Democrats have gotten in some of those tougher to win places.”
The Ohio Valley is also waiting to see whether the issue of teacher pensions will affect state legislative elections. All 100 seats in the Kentucky House and half the Senate are up for reelection, and teachers remember the bruising fight over changes to their pensions.
“Voters have a deep respect for teachers and the issues they’re facing are issues that galvanize teachers and just anybody who’s had a kid in public school,” Mikus said. “They’re willing to stand up and fight for teachers.”
At the miner’s Ohio rally, UMW President Cecil Roberts told them their concerns about pensions can make a difference if they take them ballot box.
“When the people get to marching, the politicians get to listening,” Roberts shouted.
The results on November 6th could show if Roberts is right about that.